Vice President Kamala Harris has put forward a bold proposal to increase the corporate tax rate to 28%. This move is intended to generate additional revenue to fund ambitious plans and initiatives aimed at benefiting the middle class. By advocating for a higher corporate tax rate, Harris seeks to redistribute wealth and ensure that working people receive their fair share.
If implemented, Harris’ proposal to raise the corporate tax rate to 28% could result in generating substantial revenue, amounting to hundreds of billions of dollars. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that each percentage point increase in the corporate tax rate translates to approximately $100 billion over a decade. Additionally, this policy would reverse a significant portion of former President Donald Trump’s tax cuts, which lowered the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%.
Harris aims to create an opportunity economy that prioritizes the interests of the middle class, emphasizing economic security, stability, and dignity. By proposing a higher corporate tax rate, she intends to pave the way for initiatives such as expanding the child tax credit and alleviating the financial burdens associated with housing and medical debt. However, Harris has yet to provide detailed cost estimates for her proposals or outline specific funding sources.
The call for a 28% corporate tax rate is a departure from Harris’ earlier proposal during her 2020 presidential campaign, where she advocated for a complete reversal of Trump’s tax cuts, which would have reinstated the corporate rate to 35%. This shift brings Harris in alignment with President Joe Biden’s recent budget proposal. Republicans are anticipated to oppose the 28% corporate tax rate, necessitating Democratic control of both the House and Senate for its approval.
In a potential scenario where Harris assumes the presidency, she would wield significant influence over tax policy negotiations with the GOP. With several provisions of the Trump tax cuts set to expire by the end of 2025, Congress will face critical decisions regarding which components to extend. Trump’s warnings about the potential consequences of failing to renew these tax cuts add a layer of complexity to the ongoing debate.
Overall, Harris’ proposal to raise the corporate tax rate to 28% represents a pivotal moment in economic policy discussions. The outcome of this initiative will have far-reaching implications for wealth distribution, government revenue, and the overall financial well-being of the middle class. As political dynamics continue to evolve, Harris will face challenges in garnering bipartisan support for her tax policy agenda, underscoring the complex nature of economic policymaking in contemporary governance.