Starbucks recently announced its intentions to resume contract negotiations with the union representing its baristas, commencing in January. This development follows the two-year anniversary of the first unionization of company-owned Starbucks cafes in the United States. Although more than 360 locations have voted to unionize, accounting for approximately 4% of the company’s total U.S. footprint, no contracts have been finalized thus far. This article explores the background of the labor dispute, the demands of the workers, and the challenges faced by both Starbucks and the union.
Labor disputes between Starbucks and the union, Starbucks Workers United, have gained significant attention in recent years. Employees have been vocal in their demands for higher wages and improved staffing levels at cafes, among other issues. However, regardless of demands, labor laws do not mandate a collective bargaining agreement, only stipulating that both parties negotiate in good faith. This lack of legal obligation puts a ticking clock on negotiations, as workers who lose faith in the union can petition to decertify after a year. The National Labor Relations Board has already received at least 19 petitions for decertification, but only seven have been dismissed due to Starbucks’ violation of federal labor law.
Turbulent Negotiations
Talks between Starbucks and Workers United commenced over a year ago but have been fraught with challenges. Both sides have accused each other of failing to negotiate in good faith. Starbucks has insisted on face-to-face negotiations, refusing to accept representatives appearing via Zoom. However, the union has alleged that Starbucks is using this demand as a stalling tactic. To break the impasse, Starbucks’ Chief Partner Officer, Sara Kelly, penned a letter to Workers United International President Lynne Fox, proposing the resumption of negotiations. Kelly outlined several conditions for the talks, including the absence of any audio or video recordings or feeds. Starbucks aims to start negotiations in January, involving a representative selection of stores. Workers United has confirmed receipt of the letter and stated it is currently under review, with a response planned.
Union’s Response and Workers’ Action
In response to Starbucks’ proposal, Workers United expressed a willingness to resume negotiations, highlighting their openness to meeting with the company. The union believes that any progress, advancing bargaining in a positive direction, is most welcomed. Notably, in November, Starbucks workers staged their largest-ever labor action by walking out at over 200 stores on Red Cup Day, a crucial day for the chain. This strike resulted in a significant change requested by baristas: the option of turning off mobile orders during busy promotional periods. However, Starbucks clarified that the modification to its mobile ordering system had already been planned prior to the demonstration.
The upcoming contract talks between Starbucks and Workers United present an opportunity to resolve this lingering labor dispute. However, it is crucial for both parties to approach the negotiations with a genuine commitment to finding common ground and addressing the concerns raised by the baristas. By fostering a productive and cooperative atmosphere, Starbucks and the union can reach an agreement that benefits all stakeholders involved.
The ongoing unionization saga at Starbucks has garnered significant attention, exemplifying the challenges faced by workers striving for better pay and working conditions. With the resumption of contract negotiations on the horizon, it is essential for both Starbucks and Workers United to approach the bargaining table with sincerity and a genuine desire to find resolution. The outcome of these talks will not only have implications for Starbucks and its baristas but also for the broader labor movement in the United States.
Leave a Reply