The White House is set to unveil its plans to limit certain U.S. investments in sensitive technologies in China, as well as introduce requirements for government notification regarding other investments. This move is aimed at preventing American capital and expertise from aiding China’s military advancement and posing a threat to U.S. national security.
The Biden administration has emphasized that any restrictions on U.S. investment in China will be specifically targeted, dispelling Beijing’s claims of a technology blockade. National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan stated that these measures are “tailored” rather than broad-based, aiming to avert negative consequences for American workers and the economy.
The administration’s focus for regulation will be on active investments in sectors such as semiconductors, quantum computing, and artificial intelligence. Investments made by U.S. private equity, venture capital, and joint ventures in China within these industries will be subject to scrutiny, with the government requiring notification of most transactions. Certain transactions are expected to be prohibited altogether.
In a bid to gain greater oversight of financial transactions between the United States and China, the Biden administration plans to extend the reporting requirement to include a broader range of Chinese industries. The move will provide the U.S. government with increased visibility into investments made by firms in China, bolstering its ability to monitor potentially sensitive activities.
Investments in semiconductors are expected to align with export control rules for China, issued by the U.S. Department of Commerce in October. These rules will guide the formal restrictions imposed on investment in this critical sector. Artificial intelligence investments are also set to face scrutiny, with military-related usage likely to be prohibited and other AI investments merely requiring notification.
Defining what constitutes a military application of AI will be a significant challenge for the administration. The responsibility falls upon them to draw a clear line in distinguishing AI technologies relevant to military functions. Emily Benson, the director of the Center for Strategic and International Studies’ project on trade and technology, acknowledges this challenging task and expects the administration to grapple with the intricacies of AI classification.
President Biden’s executive order is expected to direct the publication of a notice of proposed rule-making. However, the order will not come into immediate effect. Instead, a comment period will be provided to consider industry feedback before the regulations are finalized. This approach demonstrates the administration’s commitment to gathering diverse perspectives and ensuring comprehensive consideration of industry concerns.
The White House’s forthcoming plans to restrict U.S. investments in China’s sensitive technology reflect a strategic effort to protect U.S. national security interests. By adopting a targeted approach, the administration aims to limit potential risks while avoiding broad hindrances to the American economy. These measures will foster enhanced visibility and control over financial transactions, particularly in critical industries like semiconductors and artificial intelligence. However, the challenge lies in effectively defining military applications of AI, necessitating careful deliberation and expertise. Through a process of proposed rule-making and industry feedback, the administration seeks to strike a balance between regulatory control and stakeholder engagement.